Unit
5: The Trail of Tears & Aftermath
|
|
Introduction
This Unit may
be regarded as having two parts. It is recommend that students and
teachers read the Lecture Narrative, its textual
sources and its various Analytic Questions, below, by Dr. Blue Clark,
first. Central to Dr. Clark’s discussion is a reading selection
from Daniel Butrick’s Journal, a primary document recording
the actual day-to-day movement of a Cherokee group through the lower
Ohio River/Mississippi River crossings during the winter of 1838.
Afterward, you may wish to read Lesson 1, Part 2 Reappraising
Cherokee Removal the second part of Dr. Raymond Fogelson’s
Unit 1 lecture.
Guiding
Questions
- What responses
did the Cherokee offer to the implementation of the removal process?
- What was
the overall cost for United States expansion in terms of lives
and losses?
- Did Cherokee
removal establish a precedent for later American Indian removals?
Learning
Objectives
After completing
this lesson:
- Students
will be able to locate passages in historical documents related
to stated positions, showing links to evidence and to a student’s
arguments.
- Students
will have a better grasp of nineteenth-century journalism and
diary accounts of the Trail of Tears and relocation to Indian
Territories (the future state of Oklahoma.)
Lecture
Narrative
Convulsed
within by dissension and assaulted from without, members of the
Cherokee Nation in 1838 immediately had to confront their pending
forced removal from their homeland. (See Textual Sources
entry for Manufacturers & Farmers Journal)
In the state of Georgia, the military roundup of the Indians, using
United States soldiers and state militia, began on 26 May 1838.
Enforcers struck isolated farmsteads, driving Cherokee families
into collection camps. From the encampments, removal detachments
departed for their new homeland west of the Mississippi River. (For
detailed information on the widely different governance, construction,
and location of these camps or forts, see http://georgiatrailoftears.com
and go through the “Fort” button.) Ill-prepared, the
travelers suffered much privation, illness, and loss. Finally, Cherokee
leaders requested that they be allowed to oversee their own removal,
hoping to lessen the impact of the tragedy. Leaders of the 17 contingents
led their members along either overland or water routes to the new
region allocated to them, a portion of the Indian Territory in what
is now the state of Oklahoma. Thirteen of those detachments traveled
under Cherokee supervision and Cherokee conductors, most journeying
along the preferred northern route from Nashville, TN, to Hopkinsville,
KT, Golconda, IL, Springfield, MO, and into Indian Territory.
Cherokee
Indians, including both friend and foe of the federal government,
traveled the “trail where they cried,” which came to
be commonly called the “Trail of Tears.” The rich rode
wagons, while the poor trudged on foot. Missionaries like Evan and
his son John Jones, Daniel Buttrick, and Stephen Foreman accompanied
their flocks over the Trail. They held regular Christian services
along the route and sang hymns as they journeyed. Cherokee Christians
of one church even took their structure apart in their homeland,
numbered the boards, and carried them into Indian Territory, where
they lovingly reconstructed their building as the Old Baptist Mission
near what is now Westville, Oklahoma. Sometimes the devotion of
the Christian Indians won converts among their accompanying soldiers.
Others
felt differently. Removal was a major setback not only for the Indians
but also for missionary endeavors. The adverse reaction against
missionaries within the Cherokee resulted from widespread opposition
against all aspects of mainstream American society which arose from
the trauma of relocation. After all, it was the Reverent John Schermerhorn
who negotiated the Treaty of New Echota. It took some years before
conversions were achieved again by mainstream denominations among
the Cherokee.
Great
controversy centers on the usual number of 4,000 (or approximately
one-quarter) as the figure for those Cherokee who perished on the
Trail of Tears. Poor counting, scattered travelers, and wintry weather
made for challenging record keeping. Additionally, some died just
before departure, while others deceased well after their arrival
in the new Indian Territory. Those are not included in the overall
figure. Now, scholars often use one-third as the total loss.
(Readers should
turn, at this point, to Daniel Butrick’s Journal [Link to
Buttrick Journal] and read the daily entries from December 13, 1838
to February 12, 1839. See also, the National Park Service, National
Historic Trails Program, which offers information about the historic
trail routes at:
http://imgis.nps.gov/national_historic_trails.html.
The “lavender colored” route, the Northern route, is
Buttrick’s group’s route.)
No
matter what route was used, survivors offically ended their journey
at various locations within Indian Territory. Northeastern Indian
Territory became the new “Cherokee Nation” as the travelers
began their life in their new land. Old Settlers and treaty party
Cherokee had arrived earlier in the area west of the great river
and had subsequently been moved into the same region as a part of
the United States consolidation policy. The Aftermath of removal
is addressed at the end of this lesson.
Of
course, other Indian tribes underwent their own removals both before
and after the Cherokee experience.
(Alexis DeTocqueville,
Democracy in America, Chapter 10 on the future of the three races;
p. 324 describing the forelorn column of Choctaw on their Trail
of Tears passing him in Arkansas in 1831. Begin with the character
string, “it is impossible to conceive” http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/1_ch18.htm.)
Students and
Teachers May wish to refer to Unit
1, Lesson 2 at this point, for a continuation of study about
the Trail of Tears and its Aftermath
Dr. Blue Clark
School of Law
Oklahoma City University
Questions
for Analysis:
- Manufacturers
& Farmers Journal, March 15, 1838, a part of the ACTC documentation
in PDF format, contains a long letter from Cherokee Principal
Chief John Ross to the reading public. http://www.cherokeeheritage.org/Default.aspx?tabid=638
Ross tries to rebut the claims of the legality and
soundness of the Cherokee treaty party’s actions. Examine
his arguments. Do you agree or disagree with Ross? Using this
core text, you are faced with the basic arguments from one of
the key players in the whole historical drama. In his Journal,
Daniel Buttrick (the entry for Thursday, December 20, 1838) thought
about the announcement that the American Board made Elias Buodinot
an assistant missionary in the west, after he had signed the Treaty
of New Echota. The news upset not only Buttrick but also other
missionaries like Samuel A. Worcester. In his Monday, December
31, entry in his Journal, Buttrick addressed again the issue of
the Treaty. How do those entries reflect on Ross’s letter?
- Are there
portions of documents, such as the Journal of Daniel Buttrick,
with which you identify? An example may be his lament, recorded
in his Journal for Monday, December 31, 1838, as a summary of
the year 1838 while he was en route. “O what a year it has
been! “ During a cold drizzle, he noted, “For what
crime . . . was the whole [Cherokee] nation doomed to this perpetual
death”? [Link
to Buttrick Journal]
- Is Alexis
De Tocqueville sympathetic to the Indians he observed in 1831
passing before him? Is his overall account sympathetic in general
to Americans? You may extend your reading, if you wish, to the
entire section (on line, below) on The Present and Probable Future
Condition of the Indian Tribes That Inhabit the Territory Possessed
by the Union. For specific direction to the migration De Tocqueville
observed, see the link in the Textual Sources, below.
- After reading
the accounts, do you think that educated Cherokee, especially
mixed-bloods, had advantages over full-bloods?
- The Reverend
Daniel Buttrick kept a Journal of his trek. He was an eyewitness
of the events along the Trail of Tears for his detachment. Have
you taken a journey? What preparations did you undertake before
you traveled? During your journey? Upon your arrival at your destination?
Dr. Blue Clark
School of Law
Oklahoma City University
Textual
Sources:
Manufacturers
& Farmers Journal, March 15, 1838, a part of the ACTC documentation
in PDF format, contains a long letter from Cherokee Principal Chief
John Ross to the reading public. http://www.cherokeeheritage.org/Default.aspx?tabid=638
Alexis
DeTocqueville, Democracy in America, tr. George Lawrence,
pp. 38-47, on the influence of religion and the legal concept of
freedom and the formation of American civilization, building upon
obtaining land from tribal nations (begin with the character string,
“the foundation of New England” http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/1_ch02.htm;
Chapter 10 on the future of the three races; p. 324 describing the
forelorn column of Choctaw on their Trail of Tears passing him in
Arkansas in 1831. Begin with the character string, “it is
impossible to conceive” http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/1_ch18.htm
The
Journal of Daniel S. Buttrick, National Trail of Tears Association
edition, in an excerpt in PDF format, pp. 48-58, May 19, 1838-April
1, 1839, entries on the Trail of Tears crossing into Illinois and
across the Mississippi on Thursday, December 13, 1838, to February
12, 1839. Similar material is also found in Rozema (below), pp.
136-48, for exceprts from June-December 1838. [Link
to Buttrick Journal]
The National
Park Service, National Historic Trails Program, offers information
about the historic trail routes at:
http://imgis.nps.gov/national_historic_trails.html.
The “lavender colored” route, the Northern route, is
Buttrick’s group’s route.
Further
Questions:
- Are there
examples of Good Samaritans aiding the removal detachments along
their route, as revealed in Buttrick’s Journal, as for example
in the entry for Thursday, December 13, 1838?
- Because the
treaty party traveled earlier and was better prepared, do you
think they suffered less along their route? Did they get the choicest
land in the Indian Territory?
- Are there
reflections of earlier divisions among the Cherokee in later events
like the American Civil War, allotment, schooling?
- Do you think
the United States government was responsible for the treaty terms
that led to Cherokee removal? It is termed liability. Would the
federal government later have to pay the Indians for claims to
lands seized?
- Some missionary
groups at first supported Cherokee resistance to removal. But
once removal became a reality, most support for the Indians evaporated
into acquiescence of government policy? Why?
Aftermath:
Life for the
survivors began anew in Indian Territory. Retributive murders swept
the Indian nation. Eventually, life achieved some peace and prosperity.
(For some elaboration on the Civil War damage, see Unit
6, using the find function to locate, “the Civil War”.)
A few
travelers along the Trail of Tears had dropped off along their route
and descendants melded into the mainstream population as a part
of a modern diaspora. In Oklahoma today, full-blood Cherokee make
up the bulk of the membership of what is called the United Keetoowah
Band of Cherokee. Their Web site is: www.ukb-nsn.gov.
Another group, called the Oconaluftee Cherokee , remained in the
mountains of North Carolina and became the Eastern Band of Cherokee.
Their Web site today is: www.cherokee-nc.com.
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma is the largest tribal body and its
various economic enterprises provide a wide range of programs for
its membership. Its Web site is: www.cherokee.org.
Both the Eastern Band and the Cherokee Nation maintain museum programs
to help tell their stories.
Descendants
remember the pain and tragedy of removal in a variety of ways. Memories
remain, passed down in family stories from generation to generation.
(See Unit 7.) Some contemporary
Cherokee pay homage annually to Trail of Tears leaders like Daniel
Buttrick, who is buried in the cemetery at Dwight Mission in Oklahoma,
or to Samuel Austin Worcester, who is buried at of Park Hill outside
of Tahlequah. Others may pause at the gravesites of White Path and
Fly Smith, casualties of first removal detachments, along the Trail
of Tears route near Hopkinsville, KY, which are now part of a park
commemorating the Trail. Today, some American Indian families in
Oklahoma recall their ancestral struggle over their Trail of Tears
by placing a blanket over or inside the casket of a deceased tribal
family member as part of the funeral service. The gesture calls
to mind the suffering from the winter cold of their predecessors
over the Trail. Other means as well are used to perpetuate the memories
of survival. There is an annual Trail of Tears Art Show held in
Muskogee, Oklahoma, at the Five Tribes Museum. The National Park
Service has an Historic Trails program that features the variety
of routes from east to west (see “Supplemental Sources”
above). Perhaps in your area there is some sort of commemoration
among descendants from those who trod the Trail long ago.
- Do you think
the United States government was responsible for the treaty terms
that led to Cherokee removal? It is termed liability. Would the
federal government later have to pay the Indians for claims to
lands seized?
- Some missionary
groups at first supported Cherokee resistance to removal. But
once removal became a reality, most support for the Indians evaporated
into acquiescence of government policy? Why?
Students and
Teachers May wish to refer to Unit
1, Lesson 2 at this point, for a continuation of study about
the Trail of Tears and its Aftermath
Supplemental Sources:
“Trail
of Tears” film in DVD, 2006, Rich Heape Films, Dallas, Texas.
Wilma
Mankiller with Michael Wallis. Mankiller: A Chief and Her People
(NY: St. Martin’s, 1993). She is a fomer principal chief of
the Cherokee Nation.
Diane
Glancy, Pushing the Bear: A Novel of the Trail of Tears (San
Diego: Harcourt, Brace, 1996).
Robert
Conley, Mountain Windsong (Norman: University of Oklahoma,
1992), also a novel. Selections of Mountain Windsong are available
in Lesson 7.
Duane
King, The Cherokee Trail of Tears (Portland, OR: Graphic
Arts Books, 2007), a narrative that includes stunning David Fitzgerald
photographs along the routes.
The
About North Georgia group provides a history of removal forts within
that region, written by Randy Golden, at its Web site at: http://ngeorgia.com/history.cherokeeforts.html.
Sarah Hill produced a thorough examination of the collection
forts and camps involved in the Georgia portion of the Trail of
Tears for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, with support
from the National Park Service. Her report is available at: http://georgiatrailoftears.com
(and enter through “Fort” button.)
Vicki
Rozema, Voices from the Trail of Tears (Winston-Salem,
NC: John F. Blair Publisher, 2003), Chapter 11, pp. 116-123,“Until
the Sickly Season Should Pass Away, July 1838,” includes correspondence
of Chief John Ross, Gen. Winfield Scott, and a Resolution from the
Cherokee Nation; Chapter 12, pp. 124-130, “For the Comfort
and Well Being of This People, Summer 1838,” includes letters
of John Page and a list of physicians employed in camps; Chapter
13, pp. 131-135, “The Sadness of the Heart, August 1838,”
includes a letter from Cherokee leader William Shorey Cooley to
John Howard Payne on the departure of an overland detachment.
Theda
Perdue and Michael Green, eds., The Cherokee Removal: A Brief
History with Documents (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s,
1995), Chapter 5, pp. 160-169, includes a Memorial of Protest, June
1836, Letters from Evan Jones, May-December 1838, a girl named Neugin’s
Recollections, and Hitchcock’s Journal, 1841, pp. 1`70-173,
on efforts to rebuild the Cherokee Nation. (The co-editors also
offer The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears (NY: Viking/Penguin,
2007) in 208 pp.)
|